Description:
Pada mata kuliah ini mahasiswa diharapkan mampu melakukan penulisan karya ilmiah sesuai dengan kriteria penulisan jurnal, berdasarkan state of the art dari topik penelitian.
Pada mata kuliah ini mahasiswa diharapkan mampu melakukan penulisan karya ilmiah sesuai dengan kriteria penulisan jurnal, berdasarkan state of the art dari topik penelitian.
Objectives:
Mampu membuat literature review dengan menggunakan standar APA versi terbaru:
1. Mampu menulis review literature yang berkualitas dengan berbagai gaya sitasi dan aturan penulisan APA
2. Mampu melakukan meta analisis
Mampu membuat literature review dengan menggunakan standar APA versi terbaru:
1. Mampu menulis review literature yang berkualitas dengan berbagai gaya sitasi dan aturan penulisan APA
2. Mampu melakukan meta analisis
Assessment:
1. Bukti keikutsertaan workshop
2. Paper meta analisis
1. Bukti keikutsertaan workshop
2. Paper meta analisis
Topics:
1. Model dan teknik penulisan review literature, aturan penulisan APA
2. Find the problem, discrepancy das solen and das sein
1. Model dan teknik penulisan review literature, aturan penulisan APA
2. Find the problem, discrepancy das solen and das sein
Resources:
1. American Psychological Association. (2010). APA Sixth Edition. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1006/mgme.2001.3260
2. Edith Cowan University. (nd). Literature review Academic Tip Sheet. https://intranet.ecu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/20621/literature_review.pdf
3. Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711010X502733
4. Hak, T., van Rhee, H., & Suurmond, R. (2016). How to Interpret Results of Meta-Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal, (July 2018). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3241367
5. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram. PLoS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
6. University of Washington. (2010). Writing a Psychology Literature Review. University of Washington.http://courses.washington.edu/advpbw/Wrting%20Center%20-%20writing%20a%20lit%20rev%20in%20psychology.pdf
1. American Psychological Association. (2010). APA Sixth Edition. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1006/mgme.2001.3260
2. Edith Cowan University. (nd). Literature review Academic Tip Sheet. https://intranet.ecu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/20621/literature_review.pdf
3. Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711010X502733
4. Hak, T., van Rhee, H., & Suurmond, R. (2016). How to Interpret Results of Meta-Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal, (July 2018). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3241367
5. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram. PLoS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
6. University of Washington. (2010). Writing a Psychology Literature Review. University of Washington.http://courses.washington.edu/advpbw/Wrting%20Center%20-%20writing%20a%20lit%20rev%20in%20psychology.pdf
Other information:
Beban studi : 1 SKS
Semester II
Beban studi : 1 SKS
Semester II
Learning method:
Workshop
Workshop